Mediation Considerations

The King County Superior Court requires mediation before trial. Statistics show over 90% of cases settle. Here are some mediation considerations:

Why Mediate. Outside of the fact mediation may be mandatory,  lawyers must ask why are we mediating. When the insurance company is taking a no liability or limited liability position, or when it is clear there is no appreciation of the value of the case, mediation is a waste of time.  Here the lawyer should move to waive mediation or use a bargain basement mediator.

Reverse Psychology. Insurance companies expect the plaintiff lawyer to settle before trial. They take this for granted and calculate the lawyer will settle for less than a good trial result. When the plaintiff lawyer ignores settlement and works the case with the intent to try the case the insurance company is caught off guard. This is not what it is used to seeing. This leads to a better appreciation for the case which translates to higher case value.

When Mediation is Essential. When the case has been properly worked and ready for trial and you want to hear the most the insurance company will pay for the case mediation is where you want to be. In can be argued the lawyer owes it to his client to mediate whenever there is an appreciation of the case. A case has two values: The most the insurance company will pay, and what the case will bring at trial. At mediation the lawyer gets his client the most the insurance company will pay. This may be equal to or greater than the trial value. And it is a sum certain without risk.

Take Mediation Seriously.  Always submit a mediation memorandum. Show what will happen at trial. Have client bound with  mediator. Create a sense of trust, confidence and belief in the mediator. Show the mediator you know she is doing everything possible to get the highest offer. Show the mediator you have confidence in your case. When she brings in the insurance company lines on case problems swat them away as in trial. She will take this back to the insurance company. Never tell the mediator your bottom line and never show satisfaction with the insurance offer (until you know it is over).

Possibility of High Low Agreement. Consider a high low agreement when it is evident there is substantial risk on both sides and the insurance company is offering a decent amount in mediation. Under the high low agreement the insurance company agrees to pay a minimum amount even if there is a defense verdict. In exchange plaintiff agrees to limit her recovery to the high amount even if there is a runaway verdict. In a first party case (insurance company is client’s company) the insurer should pay the low amount immediately.

When to Try the Case. Before the mediation have a realistic appraisal of the trial/arbitration value of the case. If the insurance company is substantially below this evaluation (even when increased costs of trial are considered) then try the case. At least in mediation you have gained a better understanding of how defense will try the case. You have also done your job in determining  the insurance company’s highest offer.

Related Articles:

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

2 Responses to “Mediation Considerations”

  1. […] Outside of a fact intervention might be mandatory,  lawyers contingency ask whyArticle source: and Enjoy: This entry was posted in lawyer. Bookmark the permalink. ← Hitesh Jain […]

  2. Alexis Bender says:

    ..Mediation helps resolve disputes between insurance companies and claimants people claiming accident benefits . ..A claimant or an insurance company can apply for mediation if they disagree about the claimants entitlement to accident benefits or the amount of benefits that should be paid.

Leave a Reply