May 30th, 2010

Clotaire Rapaille “The Reptile Always Wins”

 

Recently I have seen posts to the effect it is demeaning to jurors to “appeal to the reptilian brain.” When we understand the reality of the reptilian brain and how it is thought to play a role in decision making we have a duty as advocates to recognize there is nothing wrong with advocacy that appeals to the reptilian part of the brain.

Appealing to the “reptilian brain”  began as a Madison Avenue selling concept developed by Clotaire Rapaille  a European psychologist. Mr. Rapaille  initially studied autism in children. He theorized there are “code words” that lead to conduct. Finding a particular code word  helped in treating an autistic child. Mr. Rapaille believes the “code” is within the reptilian brain, regardless of wheather a person is autistic.

From there Mr. Rapaille changed his career to help large corporations find their “code” to appeal to the reptilian brain of the consumer. He teaches “the reptile always wins.” This means final decisions are made subconsciously based on buried codes within the reptilian brain that Mr. Rapaille terms “the reptilian hot button.”

Exhibit A for Mr. Rapaille is the Hummer SUV. He explains the Hummer does not make logical sense as most people drive their vehicles on city streets. For an SUV Clotaire Rapaille explains the code is “domination.” Thus, the Hummer sells because it is the dominate vehicle on the road. This appeals to the reptilian “sense of safety” which is where the purchase decision is made as “the reptile always wins.”

From an advocacy standpoint it makes good sense to recognize what major corporations recognize and  have used for years. That is the reptilian brain is a key component to decision making. Jurors like all of us seek safety and security. We all have the reptilian brain and we all dislike conduct that is dangerous.

In our system when the case gets to trial the dangerous conduct has already taken place. When the dangerous conduct effects or potentially effects all of us we naturally what to stop it from happening again.  For jurors the only way to stop the conduct from happening again is through a money judgment. In our society a money judgment sends a message  the dangerous conduct is unacceptable and must stop or not happen again.

There is nothing sinister about this reality. The lawyer for an injured plaintiff is not trying to sell a product. The lawyer is trying to accomplish justice. The lawyer has a duty to point out dangers to the jury. The jury has a civic duty to act through a money judgment of fair compensation. When this is done a twofold benefit to society occurs: Plaintiff receives fair compensation for injuries caused by the wrongdoer and the wrongdoer receives the message society does not accept the wrongful conduct.

In our next post we discuss the reality of the emotional subconscious part of our brain and how it impacts decisions.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

May 29th, 2010

Beyond The Reptilian Brain

 

Jury consultants including David Ball have advocated appealing to “the reptilian brain” when presenting a case to the jury. I read David Ball’s books and consider him to be a high level jury consultant dedicated to advancing trial advocacy. I believe all serious trial lawyers read Ball and learn from him.

It is important to consider the source of the Reptilian Brain, and tailor Reptilian theories accordingly. This is because our brains are  more complex than the Reptilian Brain proponents give us credit. A couple of years ago I was introduced to the Triune Brain when reading The Biology of Transcendence: A Blueprint of the Human Spirit, by Joseph Clinton Pearce (Park Street Press, Rochester, Vermont) (2002). From Pearce I learned Dr. Paul MacLean, a physician and neuroscientist,  years ago developed the theory of the Triune Brain.

According to MacLean the human brain has evolved in three stages and  is composed of three parts. Each has its own intelligence, its own sense of time, and its own unique function. (But see Appropriateness of Triune Brain Theory).

First, we have the oldest part of our brain located at the base of the brain which he termed the Reptilian Brain. The Reptilian Brain or R-Complex evolved hundreds of millions of years ago. The R-Complex is referred to as the Reptilian Brain because it is similar to the brain of the modern day reptile. It replicates bodily processes of breathing, heart beat, and the fear and flight mechanism. The R-Complex functions in a habitual patterned way. It is unable to alter learned behavior.

The R-Complex takes over physical parts of our learned skills such as walking, running, typing, biking, driving, playing an instrument, or playing a sport. This in turn frees the upper more highly evolved areas of the brain to stand outside of motor function and observe and discover ways to improve.

Second, surrounding the R- Complex MacLean teaches we have the more recently evolved Limbic System. This is the emotional cognitive part of our brain. According to MacLean our long term memory stems from this part of our brain. Long term memory occurs when there is an emotional arousal associated with an event. The limbic system (emotional brain) is where we evolve our relationships. According to Joseph Pearce the key time frame for development of our emotional brain is the first few years of life. If we have a stable situation we are fortunate and will develop in a well balanced emotional way. Lack of stability translates to impaired emotional development.

Third, MacLean teaches stacked on top of the Limbic System and more recently evolved is our Neocortex. This is the upper and frontal parts of our brain. The Neocortex controls higher executive thought. This includes speech, mathematics, thinking and reasoning.

According to Joseph Pearce, under MacLean’s Triune Brain theory, in normal development the three brains work together, and they work together from the top down. A positive emotional state developing after birth allows the three systems to compliment one another. Thus, we are free to think and learn (Neocortex), as we are emotionally balanced (Limbic System), and on auto pilot (R-Complex). We are thinking from the top down.

Conversely, in deviant development our three brains do not work together. Because of a negative emotional state our three brains are divided. This means learning and development are impaired. Thus, we shift or reverse our thought from top down (normal) to bottom up (deviant). In a bottom up situation the reptilian controls. We become defensive, fearful, and reactionary.

In the next series of posts we will explore considerations on how we make decisions with our foundation being the entire Triune Brain. We will begin with the R-Complex Reptilian Brain.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

May 23rd, 2010

Fourth Week of May-Pursuit Of Excellence

Recently, I saw the following quote in the sports page of the LA Times discussing Daniel Guerrero UCLA Athletic Director : “If you coach for Guerrero, statistics won’t save you. Cheers won’t help you. It’s all about fitting into his carefully constructed culture of competitiveness. Do you play hard? Do you play smart? Do you play clean? Do you play to the end?”

This quote demonstrates why the means is what matters and the end takes care of itself. Each moment if we dedicate all of our energy to our present endeavor, mentally focused on our task, taking no shortcuts, and continuing to completion, we pursue excellence.

The end we do not control. The means we do control.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

May 16th, 2010

Third Week of May-The Art of Living

The master of the art of living makes little distinction between his work and his play, his labor and his leisure, his mind and his body, his information and his recreation, his love and his religion. He hardly knows which is which. He simply pursues his vision of excellence at whatever he does, leaving to others to decide whether he is working or playing. To him he is always doing both.

James Michener

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

May 10th, 2010

Second Week of May-Lessons from Marcus Aurelius

What Marcus Aurelius learned from:

His Mother. Live simply-not in the least like you are rich.

First Teacher. Do your own work, mind your own business, have no time for slanderers.

Rusticus. Behave in a conciliatory way when people who have angered or annoyed you want to make up.

Sextus. Be kind. Get along with everybody. Share your company. Display expertise without pretense.

Brother. Love family, truth and justice. Help others, and share. Do not be a pessimist.

Maximus. Have self control and resist distractions. Optimism in adversity-especially illness. Stay in balance with dignity and grace. Do your job without whining. Always act without malice.

Adopted Father. Compassion. Listen to anyone who contributes to the public good. Never exhibit rudeness, lose control or turn violent.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

May 6th, 2010

Simon Rifkind Part Two

 Simon Rifkind teaches lawyers, parties and witnesses are “actors” in the trial.  Even when they do not have lines they are on stage. Members of the audience (jurors) observe the lawyers, parties and witnesses when testifying and when not.

From my experience Rifkind is right. From a client standpoint the biggest mistake occurs when the client appears to be too involved with their lawyer in trying the case. This is off plot. The lawyer is the person who is expected to try the case. When the client appears to be telling the lawyer what to do, or when the client appears too strident, jurors dislike the client; the client loses the image of the hero and becomes a wanna be lawyer which is bad.

From the lawyer’s perspective it is essential to remain like a duck. A duck looks calm above the water but below the water unobserved the duck is paddling briskly to stay afloat. The lawyer must keep a cool demeanor in the face of trial adversity. The lawyer must show professionalism to opposition counsel, witnesses, court staff  and the judge. The lawyer should never appear to be a bully or out of control. There is nothing wrong with destroying an opposition witness, and this at times needs to be done, but it needs to be performed calmly, methodically and with professionalism.

It is also important to recognize that unlike a play the stage in a trial is anywhere a juror may observe client or lawyer or witnesses. Rifkind would agree to dress and act like going to and being in church at all times anywhere near the courthouse. This will not in and of itself win the case but it could lose the case.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

May 5th, 2010

Lessons from Simon Rifkind Part One

 

As a young lawyer wanting to be a trial lawyer I read Simon Rifkind. Mr. Rifkind was a Wall Street lawyer and partner in the firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind. He was appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt, as Federal Judge, Southern District of New York, where he served from 1941-1950. He voluntarily left the federal bench because he was bored by poor lawyering which he found the rule rather than the exception.

Mr. Rifkind’s passion was trying cases. He was a pure trial lawyer-a renaissance lawyer- in that he immersed himself into a new field for most of his trials.  He did this to grow in new areas. This allowed him to learn about life by trying cases.

Once a case gets to trial Simon Rifkind believes the same dynamics take place. These are the dynamics of trial. To Rifkind a trial is a play. There is a hero (usually his client) and a villain (usually the opposition). The jury is the audience, the judge, lawyers, and witnesses are actors. The lawyer has a unique position as he is both an actor and the producer of the play. Rifkind teaches trials like plays must have a theme. The theme should announce the client’s cause with the ends of justice. The audience will find a way to apply the law so the hero wins and justice prevails.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

May 4th, 2010

First Week of May-Beginning

My first Thought of the Week theme is “Beginning.” As Plato said: “The Beginning is the most important part of the work.” (The Republic). To accomplish anything worthwhile we must begin by working  toward what we want to accomplish. After we begin we must stay focused in the present at our highest level. It is the means that matter rather than the end.  We cannot control how our effort will be received, but we can control giving our best effort. When we stay focused and do the best we are capable of doing we know we engage in the pursuit of excellence and this is what matters.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

April 22nd, 2010

Welcome to Zen Lawyer Seattle

Welcome to the launch of the Zen Lawyer Seattle blog, brought to you by Seattle Personal Injury Lawyer Patrick Trudell.

This is my new blog page. I am a personal injury lawyer representing injured people. The photo is of my wife Kristina and me.

My blog is titled Zen Lawyer Seattle because I practice law in the Seattle area, and believe a key to life and law is living in the present. I am working on doing this as well as encouraging my clients to appreciate the present.

When a client is the victim of a personal injury it is difficult to accept the present and the injury.  This is important to do because the only way out of the injury is to attack it in the present through medical treatment and working toward recovery by being as active as possible. The key is being Zen- like: accept the reality of the injury, without blame or feeling victimized, recognize you hold the key to recovery, and recovery lies with your decision to move forward in the present to regain what you have lost through injury.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.