April 6th, 2011

Wrongful Death

To understand wrongful death law we must start in England where the common law began. At common law a plaintiff  injured by the negligence of another could recover damages from the negligent defendant. But when the plaintiff was killed, the action died with the plaintiff, so there was no wrongful death cause of action.

This changed in the United Sates with states adopting wrongful death statutory law. This post discuses how wrongful death works under Washington statutory law.

Wrongful Death Action. Washington statutory  law provides a wrongful death cause of action which must be brought by the personal representative of decedent’s estate. The law only allows certain statutory beneficiaries to recover through the personal representative.

First Tier Statutory Beneficiaries. Children (including stepchildren), spouse/domestic partner, and parents of a minor child are first tier. This means they can recover damages without showing economic dependence.

Second Tier Statutory Beneficiaries.  Parents of an adult child, and siblings who are economically dependent  on decedent are second tier statutory beneficiaries. They may recover only if there are no first tier statutory beneficiaries.

The law contemplates damages for the emotional loss of the loved one. The statute says In a wrongful death action the jury may give such damages as, under all circumstances of the case, may to them seem just. It is the lawyer’s job to recommend a just amount to the jury.

Survival Action. In Washington a survival action allows the personal representative to recover the economic loss of the decedent as well as his pain and suffering. These losses are not recoverable under the wrongful death law so a survival action is joined with the wrongful death action. Since the wrongful death law does not allow parents to recover  for the emotional loss of their adult child, the only case the parents have is for the economic loss and pain and suffering of their child while living. This action only exists to the estate so the parents must be beneficiaries of the estate.

Economic loss is based on the income decedent would have earned during his economic life expectancy. First, the life expectancy income is calculated. Second, consumption (what the person would have spent) is deducted. The balance is then  reduced to a present value (the value of the stream of income today as a lump sum amount).

Pain and suffering is calculated for the time  between the injury and death that decedent experienced pain and suffering. This is a general damage amount totally up to what the jury deems fair.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

April 3rd, 2011

First Week of April-Our Natural Energy

The energy of our bodies is so natural and so spontaneous, we almost never stop to think about it. It is like the constant rhythm of our lungs and the ceaseless circulation of our blood.

Thousands upon thousands of chemical reactions are taking place at every moment and countless electrical impulses pass through us.

We are also all part of the flow of energy around us.The intricate network of energy in our body forms part of the energy in the world. We are a miniature field of electromagnetic energy of the universe.

Master Lam Kam Chuen

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

March 30th, 2011

Being a Lawyer

This post discusses the traits of a good lawyer.

Helping People. A good lawyer cares about people. Law is a people  business, and a good lawyer likes people. He enjoys being in a  profession where he can make a difference in a person’s life by  taking care of a legal problem. He understands a legal problem  creates stress, and one of his roles is to reduce stress to his client.

A Listener. A good lawyer is a good listener. When he is meeting  with his client he focuses on his client. He listens attentively. He  internalizes what his client tells him  so he can identify with his  client’s legal situation.

Willing to Help Potential Client. A lawyer talks with a potential  client before taking the case. A good lawyer  discusses the client’s  legal situation in a meaningful way even if he choses not to take the  case. Often he will refer the potential client to a lawyer better equipped to take the case. When the legal problem is one where the potential client can solve herself the good lawyer tells him her how to do it herself. On simple matters the good lawyer does this without charging a fee.

Standing for Justice. The good lawyer stands for justice and speaks out when something is illegal or unfair. He does this even when speaking out will be at his peril. This is because the right to fairness runs through the veins of the good lawyer. This also means the good lawyer defends unpopular people and causes. He does not judge his client. He represents his client with all his ability knowing she is entitled to the best representation without the personal judgment of the lawyer.

Fairness in Fees. The good lawyer has a sense of fairness when it comes to attorney’s fees. He does not automatically charge all he is entitled to charge under his fee agreement. In a contingent fee case he does not make more then his client. In an hourly case he discourages litigation when he can obtain a fair result regardless of being able to make a higher fee going to court. In a flat fee case he ensures his fee bears a relationship to his work and the value of the result.

Professionalism. The good lawyer cares about the legal profession. He realizes young lawyers are the future. He mentors and helps young lawyers become good lawyers. The good lawyer is courteous to opposition lawyers. He treats them with respect and as equals. The good lawyer is pleasant to legal staff, to court staff and to judges. He remembers the motto “You never know who you are being nice to.”

Sleep Well. The good lawyer sleeps well. This is because the world is a better place because of how he practices law. In spending his time helping people, he has benefited his client and society. The fees he has made are fair in relation to what he has given back to his clients and to society.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

March 27th, 2011

Fifth Week of March-The Golf Swing and Life “Keep it Simple”

 

People who play golf or who have tried know there is much to do about the golf swing. Like advice on how to live your life volumes have been written and advice is never ending.  Problems with the golf swing and problems in life often occur when we over complicate.

Years ago Ben Hogan on the Ed Sullivan Show demonstrated the basics of the golf swing. Hogan’s demonstration shows a natural fluid simple motion.  Like Hogan’s demonstration of the golf swing, in life, relax, trust your natural instincts, and keep it simple.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

March 23rd, 2011

The Deposition

In this post I discuss the deposition from the perspective of my party/client as a witness and how a deposition is used at trial.

The Deposition. Evidence at trial is in two forms testimony and documents. The deposition allows a lawyer to discover what the witness will say at trial. Generally the most important witness in a personal injury case is the party plaintiff. The injured plaintiff is almost always deposed prior to trial.

Deposition of Plaintiff. Usually defense will send written questions (interrogatories) before taking plaintiff’s deposition. Time and thought need to go into the answers to interrogatories as the answers are plaintiff’s lines for the deposition. The key to a deposition is to tell the truth with power language in a direct way. Answer the interrogatories in this way to set up the deposition testimony. Eliminate modifiers and speak with nouns and verbs which translates strength.

The key to deposition and trial testimony is to be able to describe: how the injury occurred, where the injury is, what has been done to address the injury (following doctor’s advice and doing  own recovery program), strength and range of motion limitations, impact on employment and activities, and pain described without whining. Rarely show anger at defendant. As a rule do not show concern about personal property. Stick with the injuries and belief injuries will be overcome through dedication to recovery.

Defending Deposition. Let the defense lawyer ask his question unless objectionable at trial, if so, make the objection before the answer. Never let defense lawyer bully a witness. If this occurs ask court reporter to read back offensive line of questioning. Ask witness if questioning intimidated them. Ask court reporter to separately the improper section. Tell reporter you are ordering this section of deposition. Inform offensive lawyer this will be presented to trial judge at proper time.

Deposition at Trial. Plaintiff needs to read her deposition before trial. Some lawyers will have most if not all of their cross examination prepared from the deposition. There will rarely be a question not taken from the deposition so the answer stays the same from deposition to trial.

On the use of a deposition to impeach, impeach on big issues and misstatements.  Pass on the small stuff. Have significant testimony outlined before cross examination. When you have an impeachable statement do the following:

1.  Set the stage by asking the question that leads to the impeachable answer. After getting the answer, examine the witness on fact of deposition.  Occurred on,  occurred at, under oath, knew it could come back at trial.

2.  Move to publish deposition handing original to clerk.

3.  Hand original deposition to witness, and tell him to turn to page where answer is.

4. Position yourself so witness is facing jury. Tell witness line you are reading (at the line presenting fatal question). Instruct witness to read his answer.

5. Go to counsel table without saying anything as witness is facing jury. Buy 30 seconds to a minute. Come back to witness with different line of questioning.

You have correctly used a deposition.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

March 20th, 2011

Fourth Week of March-Appreciation

Know how to appreciate. There is no one who cannot teach somebody something, and there is no one so excellent that he cannot be excelled. To know how to make use of everyone is useful knowledge. Wise men appreciate everyone, for they see the good in each and know how hard it is to make anything good. Fools depreciate everyone, not recognizing the good and selecting the bad.

Baltasar Gracian

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

March 13th, 2011

Third Week of March-Trust Your Heart

Any path is only a path, and there is no affront, to oneself or to others, in dropping it if that is what your heart tells you… . Look at every path closely and deliberately. Try it as many times as you think necessary. Then ask yourself, and yourself alone, one question… . Does this path have a heart? If it does the path is good; if it doesn’t it is of no use.

Carlos Castaneda, The Teachings of Don Juan

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

March 5th, 2011

Second Week of March-Success

Success is peace of mind

which is a direct result of

self-satisfaction in knowing

you did your best to become

the best that you are capable

of becoming.

John Wooden, Head Basketball Coach Emeritus, UCLA

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

February 27th, 2011

Cosmic Consciousness

The prime characteristic of cosmic consciousness is a consciousness of the cosmos, that is, of life and order of the universe. Along with the consciousness of the cosmos there occurs an intellectual enlightenment which alone would place the individual on a new plane of existence-would make him almost a member of a new species. To this is added a state of moral exaltation, an indescribable feeling of elevation, elation, and joyousness, and a quickening of the moral sense, which is fully as striking, and more important than is the enhanced intellectual power. With these come what may be called a sense of immortality, a consciousness of eternal life, not a conviction that there shall be this, but the consciousness that he has it already.

Richard Maurice Bucke, M.D. Cosmic Consciousness , A Study in the Evolution of the Human Mind (1901).

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

February 23rd, 2011

Direct Exam of Treating Doctor

In a personal injury case one of the most important witnesses is the treating doctor. Here is my guide for direct examination of the treating doctor.

Meet the treating doctor before the direct examination. This needs to be done before the defense deposition. Cover client’s significant medical records including records that predate injuries at issue. Discuss any similar injury so the doctor is prepared to address it in the deposition and later during direct and cross examination. Discus the injury at issue.

As with all direct examination of a witness tell him what will be covered so he has a road map. Preparation is important but not at the expense of spontaneity. The direct examination is conversational rather than rehearsed. If it is being recorded remind  doctor the camera is the jury.

In direct when in doubt stick to the six good friends: who, what, when, where, why & how questions. Rarely will you go wrong with this formula on direct. Make sure doctor is testifying on a more probable than not basis on opinions concerning nature and extent of injuries as well as conditions caused by event at issue.

Begin by asking the doctor why he is here today. The first minutes of the direct examination are the most important. Have doctor tell the jury he is plaintiff’s treating physician. He has been asked to testify on the injuries his patient  sustained in the traumatic event, the course of treatment and how plaintiff is doing today. 

Discuss Doctor’s background: Medical education, Association memberships, Board certification (include Teaching positions if applicable).

Discuss treatment of traumatically injured patients with similar injuries to plaintiff. Include questions about other areas of his medical practice. If doctor’s practice lacks a forensic component elicit this testimony. If there is a forensic component  discuss the nature of this practice, and how it differs from a treating practice.

On treatment of client start with when he began treating client. If before injury what type of treatment. Cover pre- injury treatment or lack of treatment so jury hears pre-injury condition from you rather than defense during cross examination. On treatment for injury discuss  initial subjective presentation, examination (covering objective findings), diagnosis (making sure more probable than not caused by injury mechanism), and treatment plan.

Illicit testimony on significant appointments. Cover subjective presentation and examination findings  (which is objective evidence of injury). Cover referrals such as physical therapy and diagnostic studies. Elicit testimony on any significant medical record outside our doctor. Also have doctor explain significant diagnostic findings and how they were caused by the injury.

Unless waiving specials, have doctor testify all treatment he gave and referred is necessary to address client’s injuries. Get testimony that bills for necessary treatment are reasonable. Cover future medical care necessary to address continuing conditions as well as reasonable estimate of future medical costs.

Cover disability or impairment rating based on AMA Guidelines, impact on activities, impact on employment, pain and suffering (past, present, & future).

Conclusion. On a more probable than not basis is condition a result of the injuries sustained in our collision (causation). Discuss plaintiff’s history of  subjective presentation being objectively consistent with subjective presentation. Discuss plaintiff’s dedication to recovery. End with future residuals being more likely than not.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.