October 20th, 2010

“I can slam on my brakes and sue you.”

I recently received a comment to a blog post where the writer quoted the bumper sticker “I can slam on my brakes and sue you.” In this post is my response:

Misunderstanding of Tort Law. As the great jurisprudential scholar Oliver Wendell Homes says: “The law should make common sense.” Well it does when we legally analyze the slam on my brakes and sue you statement.  In this situation the brake slammer loses the lawsuit. The law does not provide an automatic recovery to one who is rear ended. In fact under tort law a person who slams on her brakes for no reason (except to bring a lawsuit) loses and is responsible for the damage to the following driver. On top of this the brake slammer will not be covered by her insurance. This is because auto insurance insures against negligence not against an intentional wrong.

Force of a Rear End Collision. The writer of the comment fails to recognize the force and resulting injury potential in a rear end collision. A rear end collision can cause serious injury to both drivers. All of my clients in rear end collisions would  give back their recovery in exchange for their pre-injury condition. Added to this is the moral issue of intentionally causing a collision, in a misguided attempt to abuse the law, and causing injury or damage to an innocent fellow human being.

 Some People Actually Believe This. As a personal injury lawyer trying automobile collision injury cases to juries it is important for me to recognize there are people who believe the statement of our comment writer. In my next jury trial I will ask potential jurors if any agree with “I can slam on my brakes and sue you.” This will allow me to identify jurors who believe most lawsuits are a meritless attempt to get money. Once identified I will go into the thought process with the potential juror  which may lead to a successful challenge for cause. “Given your feeling that personal injury lawsuits are often meritless, do you agree it will be fairer for plaintiff if you sit on a jury in a different type of case?” If challenge for cause does not work then a peremptory challenge will have to be used.

Happy and Sad. I am happy to have seen and thought about the slam on my brakes comment as it will allow me to better engage during  jury selection. I am sad a person may actually think and believe this. No competent personal lawyer would represent such a person.  First, the brake slammer is liable in tort. Second, there will be no insurance coverage to pay as automobile insurance covers negligence not intentional tort. Third, there is no consideration for the other guy who is injured/damaged because of a misguided attempt  to abuse the law. Finally, the brake slammer could and should face criminal charges for vehicular assault which means jail time.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

October 17th, 2010

Third Week of October-Determining Perfect Conduct

Perfect conduct is a relation between three terms: the actor, the objects for which he acts, and the recipients of the action. In order that conduct should be abstractly perfect, all three terms, intention, execution, and reception, should be suited to one another. The best intention will fail if it either work by false means or address itself to the wrong recipient. Thus no critic of value of conduct can confine himself to the actors attitude alone, apart from the other elements of performance.

William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

October 10th, 2010

Second Week of October-Economy

Most of the luxuries, and many of the so-called comforts of life, are not only dispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind.

With respect to luxuries and comforts, the wisest live a more simple and meager life than the poor.

The ancient philosophers were poor in outside riches but rich with inward riches.

Henry David Thoreau

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

October 8th, 2010

Thou Shalt Not Dwell on the Trees

The full commandment is Thou Shalt Not Dwell on the Trees Rather than the Forest. Sadly this is a disease  many lawyers catch. It is often seen in young lawyers, and in lawyers billing on an hourly basis, but it is not confined to these lawyers. The disease continues throughout the career of abusive lawyers who use incessant  dwelling within the trees to wear down an opponent.

The problem with dwelling on the trees is it wastes time, is usually of plot, and judges hate it.  This is because little is gained when the lawyer overly focuses on procedural and discovery issues that have little or no relevance to the merits of the case. Dwelling in the trees rather then the forest is seen in:

Nonsense Affirmative Defenses. These include “Failure to State a Claim” in a solid lawsuit where the merit of the pleading is certain; “Insufficiency of Service” where service has been obtained; “Failure to Mitigate” despite plaintiff diligently attacking injuries;  and,”Failure to Join a Party” in a simple two party case. The list goes on-the tree dweller throws out affirmative defenses despite the fact they will never be argued.

Abusive or Meaningless Discovery. This is seen in the interrogatories of the tree dweller. Typical abusive/meaningless questions include: Questions on specifics of medical treatment when the answers are in the medical records that are being produced; slightly changed “repeat questions” that call for same information already given;  and, questions about past medical conditions or problems that have nothing to do with the area of the body injured in the case.

Discovery Games. Refusing to provide discovery answers or documents by standing on a technical language or  a drafting mistake when the discovery sought is still clear to the non producing party; Ignoring discovery deadlines on purpose forcing the issue up to the brink of a motion to compel;  and, making technical discovery objections thereby forcing a discovery motion.

Trial Games. Refusal to cooperate with opponent during trial on matters that have nothing to do with the merits of the case but do have a lot to do on efficiently moving the case through trial.

All of the above dwelling in the trees issues are non existent when the lawyers live in the forest. This means they have a handle on the substantive facts and law of the case, they cooperate on producing documents opposition is entitled to, and they cooperate on timing issues in the trial so it moves efficiently.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

October 3rd, 2010

First Week of October-Giving

“Kindness in words creates confidence. Kindness in thinking creates profoundness. Kindness in giving creates love.”  Lao Tzu

“We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give.” Winston Churchill

“No one has ever become poor by giving.” Anne Frank

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

September 28th, 2010

Learning from Adversity-Lesson from Jake Locker

When I win I do little reflection on how I tried the case. I take the win as affirmation I have done a quality job and assume I have it down. When I lose I do a lot of reflection. I revisit the trial from jury selection through closing argument critiquing my work. From this I learn and get better.

This year the University of Washington football team has high hopes largely because of the return of Jake Locker. Locker was projected to be a first round draft pick in this year’s NFL draft. He turned down the opportunity and returned for his final year as quarterback. Locker and the team have started 1 and 2 with his last game being one of the worst of his career. Recently I read a story/interview of Jake Locker. He has wisdom beyond his years from which we can learn:

Right after a Significant Defeat. Obviously you think about it right after and review what happened. “But if you dwell on it it’s going to continue to beat you.” The most important thing is getting back to work and working toward the next contest.

Wondering What If. There is nothing you can do about it once it is over. So you don’t gain anything wondering what if.

Questioning  Yourself. Trust  the fact you made the decision to [play football/try cases] because you believe in yourself and this is what you want to do no matter what the outcome. Obviously it is tough to lose, but make it a loss to learn from and get better.

Get Back to Work. After the loss get back to work as soon as possible. Uncover your mistakes and correct them. Prepare for the next contest taking lessons learned from defeat.

Win the Next One. Return with the attitude the loss is behind you. There are trials to look forward to and prepare for. Keep  practicing hard, preparing well, and go into it giving your best effort.

With this attitude the wins will come. 

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

September 26th, 2010

Fifth Week of September-What is Truth

It would be absurd to maintain one’s own age of the world is beyond correction by the next age.

He who acknowledges the imperfections of his instrument, and makes allowance for it in discussing observations, is in a much better position for gaining truth then if he claimed his instrument to be infallible.

“If we claim only reasonable probability, it will be as much as men who love the truth can ever at any given moment hope to have within their grasp. Pretty surely it will be more than we could have had, if we were unconscious of our liability to err.”

William James, The Varieties of  Religious Experience

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

September 22nd, 2010

Thou Shall Kick Thy Opponents Ass With Professionalism and Courtesy

As a trial lawyer representing injured people I must file cases more often than not to get fairness. In today’s economic climate many insurance companies are giving low ball settlement offers which a weak lawyer who cannot try a case will convince his client to accept or a client in economic hard times will take. Since I have an obligation to get fairness for my client I proceed to trial rather then take the low ball offer.

This means I regularly work against lawyers for the insurance companies. I play hard, I play fair, and I play to the end. Although I play to win, I treat my opponent with respect and decency. This means I have meaningful conversations with the other lawyer. I listen to the other lawyer. I cooperate  with scheduling with the other lawyer. And when I do well I never act like I beat the other lawyer.

This I believe is the mark of a true professional. And you know when I am decent to the other lawyer she is decent to me. We both will argue our case but this can be and should be done without getting personal, petty, or nasty. I find treating the other lawyer with professionalism and courtesy makes me feel better and I do just as well if not better for my client.

So when when you do not have much to say, and the going is tough, as your opponent is making hay, just remember at times it can be rough.  Accept these times and remember your time will come. Continue to  prepare, believe in yourself, accept bad things can happen,  give your best effort, and never, never lose your professionalism.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

September 19th, 2010

Fourth Week of September-Our Choices Define Us

We must acknowledge that our past choices, taken as a whole, represent and define our character.

Our meaning in life comes from our  choices, and when our choices display a certain pattern, then, that is the  person we have chosen to become.

We are what we do. Our choices are the  means of determining our character, and the meaning we have given our lives.

Of course we are always free to become a new person if we so chose to act in the future.

Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980)

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

September 15th, 2010

Lessons from a Blue Angel

Recently I heard a former Blue Angel, Rear Admiral William Newman, speak. In 1978/79 Admiral Newman was the Commanding Officer/Flight Leader of the Blue Angels. The leader is called “The Boss.” He is responsible for calling by radio the flight moves. This is done as the planes are flying next to each other at over 450 mph.

I took some notes and below apply them to the practice of law. I think they also apply to other professions or endeavors:

Have a Set Method. When flying next to each other at over 450 mph and changing the formation without changing the space between planes the Blue Angels must have a set method. To not is to risk a fatal accident.

Working a legal case involves legal life or death to the client. Years of experience has taught me to have a set method. This means all cases are taken in the same way. All discovery is done by a set method  with client involvement in the same way in every case. Trial preparation is done the same way. I have found by applying a set method without deviation mistakes rarely happen. We are thoroughly prepared and ready to fly into trial in an organized formation.

Concentration. This is essential for the Blue Angels. Without concentration mistakes happen. The same is true in law. When I go to work I am well rested and focused on the task at hand. When I am dealing with a client  the client is first and foremost in my mind. I listen. This allows me to internalize key facts and  the nature and extent of my client’s injuries. This results in legal representation at the highest level.

Trust. With the Blue Angels there is trust between the pilots. They trust the other pilots are performing at their highest level. This gives them confidence in relying on one another as they travel at high speeds a few feet from each another.

With my staff and me there is trust. They take their jobs seriously. They come to work focused and prepared. They work at their highest level. They know I am doing the same. There is also trust between our client, and my staff and me. We know our client takes her case seriously. She keeps appointments and deadlines. She is honest and forthright. She knows we are dedicated to her case and trusts us. Trust allows us to work together with confidence.

Keep the Team Together. When flying next to each other at 450 mph there can be no dissension. There must be team spirit. It is the job of the Blue Angel “Boss” to keep the team together.

This is my job as “The Boss” in my law practice. Keeping the team together is done through example, praise, and professional camaraderie. All staff are treated equally. Although I am the boss, my staff knows I respect them, value them, and listen to them. They know we are a team. We work together to give the highest level of leg

Continue to Develop. Although the Blue Angel shows have similarities to past years, and there is an established tradition, they continue to develop. Planes change with technology. Nothing remains stagnant.

This is true in my law practice. My staff and I continually up date our technology. We continually review our systems and make improvements to stay with technology and  new developments.  By continuing to develop we continue to fly at our highest level.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.